As we edge closer and closer to the end of the Presidential primaries, Americans are biting their fingernails and getting worked up into an increasing furor over one name- TRUMP. A polarizing figure indeed, I have heard many a “Left-leaning” individual proclaim (and there are a lot of them in Portland) that if Trump wins, they will be leaving the country. Of course, these may be the same people I heard saying similar things about the (never) potential victory McCain back in ’08, but this time they might be serious. Donald Trump’s brand of hardline Nationalist rhetoric has stirred up something in a large segment of the American people that has scared the holy hell out of many a “Leftist” as well every branch of the current establishment.
This fear has incited an all-out attack the likes of which I have never seen. Whether it’s MSNBC or Fox News or “Jimmy Kimmel Live” or “The View”- no one has anything good to say about Donald Trump. From various charges and allegations of racism and xenophobia, to supposed ties to the mafia and the KKK, to jokes about him wanting to sleep with his own daughter, right on down to the New York Times openly calling for someone to assassinate him – there seems to be no man the establishment media hates right now more than Donald J. Trump. But the problem is that the more the establishment spews hate onto him, the more popular he becomes.
Every week a new meme comes out in the mainstream news media that is inserted in the “echo chamber” – being parroted by the multitude of various establishment news outlets across the country and across the world. The latest one can be seen in the title of provocatively titled “Another Hitler? How world leaders see Donald Trump”. The article states how leaders like Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto compared Trump to Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler. Peña Nieto went on to say how
There have been episodes in the history of humanity, unfortunately, where these expressions, this strident rhetoric has only really been (a) very fateful stage in the history of mankind…
The article went on to state how people like former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Bill Richardson felt Trump’s views “reflect an isolationism that worries world leaders”.
The piece concluded with the “few” who praise Trump, among them being former leader of France’s far-Right, ultra-nationalist National Front, Jean-Marie Le Pen – father of current National Front leader and French presidential hopeful, Marine Le Pen The other one of these “few” was the perpetual boogeyman of the Western establishment media (who has also been compared to Hitler), Russian Prime Minister and staunch Nationalist, Vladimir Putin. This correlates with a recent strategy being pursued in the mainstream media which is to attempt to tarnish Trump’s image by associating him with “demonized” figures like former Congressman and White Nationalist leader, Dr. David Duke.
But the mainstream media establishment has become so despised by an ever-growing section of the American public that despite all these “bad guys” supporting Trump, he continues to ride a tidal wave of “angry populism” and appears well on his way to choking the Republican presidential nomination out of an incredibly reluctant GOP establishment (of course barring any dirty tricks or slight-of-hand tactics). And while this “racist”, “xenophobic”, and politically incorrect brand of Nationalism seems to be embodied in the form of the Trump phenomenon here in America, over in Europe the rise of the “far-Right” in response to the “Refugee Crisis” has sparked what seems to be an ever-mounting resistance to “global progress”. So what can be done to stop all of this? How can we stem the tide of “Right-wing” populism and keep another rise of “Fascistic Nationalism” from occurring in the Western world?
As Trump has been compared to both Hitler and Mussolini, perhaps we should see what it was that led to their rise to power. At the end of World War I, the weakened nations of mainland Europe found themselves under siege by continuous string of Communist revolts and attempted coups. After the primarily Jewish-led and primarily Jewish-financed Bolshevik Revolution of Russia in 1917 and the subsequent “Red Terror”, many within the nations of mainland Europe were on high alert – in particular those veterans who had just returned from combat fighting for their countries. After the setup of the Communist government in Russia, the organization known as “Communist International” or “COMINTERN” was formed with the expressed goal of setting up a world-wide Communist dictatorship based out of Moscow. The success of the Bolshevik Revolution inspired other attempted Communist coups and revolts in European nations like Hungary, Romania, Germany, Italy, and Spain. It was these continuous attempts atpolitical destabilization as well as assassination that directly resulted in the rise of Hitler in Germany, Mussolini in Italy, and led to the Spanish Civil War and the rise to power of the Nationalistic General Franco- all of which occurred in order to crush the Communist threat.
A “far-Left” ideology, Communism promised a utopia through obliterating cultural identity and national sovereignty in favor of an atheistic “equality” (i.e. “sameness”) where no one was able to rise “above” another in any manner whatsoever (with the exception of the ruling bureaucracy, of course). Communism was sold to the underclass as a “worker’s paradise”, however in practice, Communism always quickly turned into what became the most brutally oppressive authoritarian regimes in modern history, with a death toll in the hundreds of millions (far superseding anything attributed to “Fascism”). Anyone who lived during the time of Communist Russia or Eastern Europe will tell horror stories that drastically counter the utopian dreams of fresh-out-of-college Marxists who never actually experienced Communism in the real world.
Communism was financed by the international financial establishment and was a tool for undermining national stability with the expressed goal of instituting a form Globalism. As I have said in previous articles, the major theme of was Nationalism vs. Globalism and Nationalism lost. So what is Globalism? Well, first let us define its opposite, which is Nationalism. Nationalism is the idea that the goals and overall wellbeing of an individual nation and its people should be placed at the forefront of the nation’s leaders in government as well as business and finance. Nationalism tends to be placed under the banner of Conservative or “Right-wing” ideology as it seeks to preserve a distinct cultural or national identity and self-determination.
Globalism, on the other hand, is the idea that the needs of the “global community” as a whole supersede those of the individual nation, and that the political and business leaders of a nation should ultimately be committed to this ideal. This “global community” is not the collective nations and peoples of the world, but rather it is international finance capital and multinational corporations – entities who have no allegiance to any nation, and benefit from a world without borders and national sovereignty. These are things that have traditionally stood as “firewalls” and defense systems against corporate entities who otherwise would pillage whatever nation had resources they coveted. That is how it has always worked. In the past it’s been called “Imperialism”, it’s been called “Colonialism”, and now it’s called “Globalism” – the name has changed, but the goal has always been the same. It is Globalism that has been lifted up as the “virtuous ideal” of “progressive” Western society.
Globalism is “multiculturalism”. Globalism is nations without borders. Globalism is people without cultural identity outside of commercial consumerism. Globalism is international trade deals like NAFTA and TPP that place the bottom line of multinational corporations above the interests of a nation and its people. Globalism is slave factories in China with suicide-prevention nets outside the windows. Globalism is select multinational corporations having monopoly and complete control over all technology and resources. Globalism is financial oligarchs literally owning the world through debt. Globalism is Technocracy of the elitist specialist class. Globalism is the imposing of “Cultural Marxism” on the general population, causing us to become completely demoralized and debased. Globalism is the use of technology and pharmaceuticals to transform us into literal automatons – replaceable like cogs in a machine and perfectly okay with that being the way it is. Globalism is “world peace”because there are no wars among slaves.
“Communism” was only a phase of the one long term goal, which always was and is a completely integrated global system where a select group of elitist oligarchs sit perched above the hordes of drone-like humanity who have no culture and no identity other than what is literally programmed into them. Sounds like a dystopian nightmare out a science fiction novel? Go read the writings of the ideological founder of the E.U., Coudenhove-Kalergi, or the co-founder of the Council on Foreign Relations Zbignew Brzezinski, or former White House Science Czar, John P. Holdren, or former Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, or former mentor to President Clinton, Carroll Quigley, or current head of Google’s A.I. program, Ray Kurzweil. People in the highest, most influential places in Western government, academia, business and finance want exactly what I just described and are working quite diligently to ensure that Globalism reaches its logical “endpoint” – a global corporate government with a tinyelite sitting on top controlling all wealth and resources, while the masses of people (who are allowed to live) live in a form of neo-feudalistic serfdom.
This is Globalism, and it is the increased attempts at creating this global system through undermining the sovereignty and culture of individual nations and peoples that causes the rise of “far-Right” Nationalism in any country. Nationalism can be seen as gruff and aggressive by many and is at times totalitarian in its own right. For many, Nationalism could be likened to a swift punch in the gut while Globalism is slowly dying from the worst kind of poison or parasite. Personally I tend to lean a bit more Libertarian/Anarchist than most Nationalists, but at the end of the day I would take the swift punch in the gut if I had to take one or the other, but I realize some are not so keen on that.
So for those who are seriously pondering the question of “how do we stop the rise of the far-Right”, I would say the solution is two answers – one for the general “Left-leaning” public and one for the establishment. For my fellow countrymen and human beings on the Left, I will simply say that the far-Right is a reaction to Cultural Marxism and its parent ideology of Globalism. So in order to lessen the reaction, your best bet is to distance yourself from those two ideologies and see how you are being used as a pawn in a game. Believe it or not, the establishment still needs you – for now.
Now for those of you who may be reading who consider yourself part of the “establishment”, I know you think you can co-opt this movement if you have to and in many cases you have. For all we know Trump could be the biggest political con-job you’ve ever pulled, but regardless, the storm has already started and you’ve pushed the people too far. For all the shills you’ve bought off, more and more real, honest, red-blooded Americans, Europeans and other Nationalists from around the world are getting pissed off and getting in the game. In truth there is really only one way you can stop the rise of an unwavering, populist, grassroots, Nationalistic “far-Right” movement, and it’s simply this –