A couple of weeks ago asked me to recommend a solution for streaming high quality audio from a music performance in Barcelona to the here in Melbourne. The venues at either end were connected to the Internet using domestic-grade ADSL2 modems. This certainly wasn’t a super-high-bandwidth Internet 2 academic network scenario. bP wanted high quality audio (“320 kbps mp3″ was the way he put it), video was optional. It wasn’t a collaborative performance, the audio only had to travel in one direction.
I’ve been working with streaming real-time audio over LANs a bit lately, but streaming from Barcelona to Melbourne is quite a different proposition — not something I have any personal experience with. I do have an interest in network music peformance and I’ve been following development of the for a while, which is designed for low-latency distributed music performance. So I was interested to find some answers. I figured the best thing to do was to ask around and see what solutions people are using. I asked on and the celt-dev list and pinged a few friends privately too. This post shares the responses I received and a few of my thoughts on different approaches. If you know of something else I havn’t mentioned here please post it in the comments.
Before I get on to the alternatives people suggested I want to note a couple of points I made to bP:
Another thing that became apparent, and that was reinforced to me by a number of people, was that you need to be sure your internet link can sustain the bandwidth needed for the performance. It’s all good and well to ask for 320kbps audio streaming, but if your Internet link can’t reliably sustain the bandwidth then it won’t happen. In general no public link between Barcelona and Melbourne with ADSL endpoints guarantees bandwidth but you can at least test things a work out what the upper practical limit is — keep in mind that it will depend on network routes and network load (i.e. day of week and time of day).
On to the options that were suggested…
Early on I’d suggested Skype as a simple and easy plug-and-play option. I like the idea of using a voice chat-app because it’s super-easy to set up and the software should be able to navigate the hazards of domestic situations like NAT firewall traversal without fuss. However one of the key things bP wanted was high-fidelity music grade audio. This put a lot of voice-quality internet-chat applications out of the picture. I learnt there are solutions that use the music-quality CELT codec I mentioned above (which incidentally promises better quality than mp3 at the same bit rate). To this end, Dennis Heerema on the celt-dev mailing list suggested the following two free solutions:
A number of people suggested or streaming. These are the usual go-to choices for internet radio broadcasting. You can buy streams from various commercial suppliers around the web.
People had good things to say about ($40, Mac OSX only) as a simple solution for non-technical people. Matt Hitchcock said: “It is a GUI wrapper with an icecast underbelly and runs intuitively and without any fuss.” There’s a .
Jordan Reyne uses shoutcast for her Second Life performances “their sound quality is excellent”. She uses a , which is available for Windows, Mac and Linux. Jordan has posted a
Distributed network music performance is the idea of playing music live with other people over the internet. Audio quality is important here, but so is low-delay. After all, playing in time is difficult with a 50ms delay, let alone a 10 second delay! One important thing to note here is that audio codecs such as mp3 add a lot of delay just encoding and decoding the audio. So it becomes important to use uncompressed audio or low latency codecs such as or its successor (both with <5ms codec delay).
For low-delay distributed network music performance Alex Carôt’s seems to be the go-to solution. As well as distributed musical performances Alex says that it’s “already used by numerous radio stations and for other high-quality audio/video streaming purposes.” The big advantage of systems like this is that they are designed to provide low-latency two-way communication for collaborative performances. Delays are often orders-of-magnitude lower than systems designed for broadcast streaming. Unfortunately you still have the speed of light to contend with (~86ms from Melbourne to Barcelona in a fibre optic cable, not to mention routing delays).
For high-bandwidth situations a few people suggested Juan-Pablo Caceres’ . JackTrip can handle uncompressed and multichannel audio and is commonly used on local area networks. For streaming over the Internet from Barcelona to Melbourne using ADSL modems this option just wasn’t going to cut it.
mission “is to make audio broadcasting as easy as possible, both for casual broadcasters, musicians and DJs.” They provide client and server applications for both Mac and PC. It’s not a free service but you can sign up for a 15 day free trial. This solution really appealed to me for bP’s situation — it’s focused on high quality audio for musical performance and it’s packaged in an easy to use, off-the-shelf app.
A couple of people suggested VLC. wrote:
Another option that I have used in the past particularly if you are just going one way with most of the content is to use Video Lan Client. If you have enough bandwidth you can do point to point streaming of HD with that, especially if you have hardware compression. We did a direct link between the stage at Stanford and University in Bejing this way with great success. Engadget have a nice intro here:
I’m not really familiar with live video broadcasting services such as and but the venue in Barcelona had used Livestream before and it appears to offer good quality audio, although perhaps not the “320kbps mp3″ quality we were looking for. These options support video and broadcast, which although not critical in this case could be useful for many applications.
was also suggested, this is “Apple’s standards-based live encoding software.”
Which solution did bP end up using? I’m not telling As often happens there was little time to try out all of the options and a choice was made based on expediency. My feeling is that any of the solutions listed above could have worked well and are certainly worth exploring for future events.
In the future I hope setting up a hi-fi intercontinental audio link is as easy as placing a phone call, and with many of the solutions above we’re almost there. The hardest part for the uninitiated seems to be in working out which solution to choose. Do you have experience performing music over the internet? If so, please share your experience in the comments.
Many thanks to Alex Carôt, Nick Collins, Ken Fields, Scott Gresham-Lancaster, Dennis Heerema, Matt Hitchcock, Julian Knowles, Jordan Reyne, Rob Watson and the members of ACMA-L and celt-dev for helping bP and I out and answering our questions. Thanks to bP for asking the question, I’ve learnt a lot.